ashinae: (Default)
Yes, yes, and also yes. Other people say things better than I do.

And, yeah, [livejournal.com profile] fandom_counts.

I do have journalfen and greatestjournal accounts. I'm not planning to leave right now. I'm not planning to leave unless fandom is explicitly told "not welcome", which I don't exactly see happening here. (If someone wants to go ahead and point to me, exactly, where 6A/LJ are saying "we don't want you fannish types here", please do.) JournalFen's server is a little too, um, ROBUST for my tastes all the time. GreatestJournal is more cluttered with ads, last I checked, and often slower than molasses, and 2000 icons, whee, most of which never show up for me. YMMV.

ExpandBut why can't I gather up my end-of-the-world righteous anger over any aspect of this? Am I too cynical, too complacent, a little from column A and a little from column B? )
ashinae: (Default)
Now I remember why I stayed away from message boards for SO LONG. I haven't seen much of this on LJ, but, oy vey.

I'm torn between laughing at everyone who is so angry about being "jerked around" and "omg I'm never gonna watch this show again if they keep going on hiatus wah wah" and repeatedly smacking my face into my desk in frustration. I think these people are new to television-watching or something.

Nevermind the fact that all the news I read said the current hiatus, after this week's episode, would only be for five weeks and not six. (links to articles for proof of that; last and longest one mentions hiatus about half-way or closer to the end.)

We are lucky with this show! So lucky that they give us eleven, then seven, then five episodes in a row. Heroes is only one of three current-run shows I watch. Allow me, if you will, to rehash the current (third-season) airing schedule for House:

Season premiered September 5, 2006 -- aired 4 consecutive episodes, then went off the air for 4 weeks (the World Series - fair enough). Fox aired 5 eps (Oct 31-Nov 28), and now this is when it gets fun. It was off for 1 week. They aired 1 ep; were off 3 weeks; aired 1 ep; off 2 weeks; aired 3 episodes (ooh! this was February sweeps) and finally off for 2 weeks. This leads us to present, today, March 6, 2007, when there'll be 1 new episode, then another 2-week gap, then there'll be 1 new episode, and then my usual sources (including TV.com) has no new dates for new episodes.

The show premiered three weeks before Heroes, and has managed to be two episodes behind! And it's got one fewer episode, with the standard 22-episode seasons. The beginning really wasn't that bad. Four on, four off, five on.

So does everyone want a new episode, no new episode for two weeks, new episode for three, no new episode, new episode, no new episode for three weeks, and on like that?

Or! How about Stargate SG-1, which aired ten consecutive weeks from July to September, and then will air the final ten episodes in North America starting in April? Hello, seven-month hiatus! Nevermind the fact that the show has only ever had 20-episode seasons.

Which TV-show Powers That Be(tm) has been jerking which fans around, exactly? Isn't it easier to maintain interest in a show when you're given a few months' worth of episodes at a time to watch, rather than just a few weeks? Wouldn't you rather watch seven episodes in a row, rather than just one or two before they pull it off the air for some reality TV show?

Buncha whiners. Try being a House fan. What does FOX actually have going for them, besides American Idol? 24 and House. I know 24 just airs all its episodes from January to May, no repeats or hiatuses -- I guess that's the other option. But NBC is being very, very kind to its fans with the Heroes airing schedule.
ashinae: (Default)
Okay, really now. I think if I read about how Ron and Hermione aren't right for each other because they tease each other and bicker, I might have an apoplexy.

Han and Leia?
Maddie Hayes and David Addison?
Practically any of the couples that Jane Austen has written?
Any of the couples off of Firefly?

John Crichton and Aeryn Sun beat the crap out of each other on occasion! (zomg! abuuuuuuuuuse!) Buttercup treated Westley horribly. Will Thatcher yelled at Joceyln!

Oh. My. God. The horror!

And I've come this far, and I just don't have the energy to go on to the "but how often does Harry defend his twu wub against Ron's vicious attacks?" or the "um, haven't you ever been a kid/teenager with out of control hormones and the whole 'pulling-her-pig-tails-cuz-he-likes-her" thing or... just...

*falls over and weeps*

<wank>

Mar. 18th, 2006 07:37 pm
ashinae: (Default)
People who complain about receiving feedback that just says: "I love it!" or something similar...

STFU. At least you're getting feedback.

</wank>
ashinae: (Default)
*a tiny voice in the wilderness*

I really just like Harry Potter cuz it's fun.

Yeah. Honestly. It's fun, it's cute, it's got lotsa slashy/porny opportunities, but great litrachoor it ain't. Am I a heathen for these thoughts? Looking at the Daily Snitch today, this viewpoint makes me think I am. Really here. If I was gonna look for lots of metaphors and layers and whatnots I'd be reading Shakespeare.

ExpandObligatorily cut for vague talk of HBP stuff )

I mean, isn't it easier on the heart or something, to set expectations a little lower and wait to see if you're pleasantly surprised? *G*

So if it's not at all apparent, I'm just tired and rambly and have had some thoughts I wanted to set down.

Yeah, so ultimately, my thoughts on the HP fandom at large right now are basically, Hey, chillax. Read some fic. Read some slash. Read some porn. Read some unconventional ships. Read some other bloody author with depth and layers. But is all the whinging necessary?

Yeeaaah g'night.

Ponderings.

May. 8th, 2005 11:22 am
ashinae: (Default)
You know, it's funny. I've been working on a vid for Phantom, and thinking about how, well, pretty much everybody hated it -- in stark contrast to the way I hated Troy, whereas just about everybody I seem to know enjoyed it.

And, you know, I think I've really come to understand why I liked the film version of Phantom so much.

1) I never actually liked the play itself. Don't get me wrong, I love the music. A lot. But as a production, it never worked for me. I saw it once, and that was enough; but I've listened to my soundtrack countless times -- to the point where I actually wore out my tape and went several years without until I managed to get my hands on a CD copy.

2) The only Phantom and Christine, until the movie, that I liked were Colm Wilkinson and Rebecca Caine. Yes, that's right. You heard me. This is my big confession: Michael Crawford and Sarah Brightman make my ears bleed. They really do. Can't stand their voices.

I've always felt rather like a heathen for feeling that way. But there it is, the truth is out, and I go now to keep working on viddage.

(And you know, what was kind of fun was that there are moments in this movie that look kinda like I could have edited them together. Heh.)

Incidentally -- I'm rather feeling the need to watch HHGttG again. Hee!
ashinae: (Default)
The fact that Joss Whedon acknowledged that Spike and Angel had done it at some point in the past 100 years; the fact that Joss Whedon gave Inara Serra a female client; the fact that Joss Whedon had a canon lesbian character who had two canon lesbian relationships -- it's a lot better than what Rob Tapert gave us for Xena. A whole fucking lot better. It's a lot better than the subtle ambiguous hints that werewolf=homosexual that we were given by Cuaron, Kloves, and possibly Rowling if she really does get some measure of approval on the Harry Potter movies.

We haven't come that far in the past ten years, since Xena: Warrior Princess came on the air. If I had a dollar for every time I've read someone saying that they stopped watching Xena when Xena and Gabrielle got "too gay", I could treat myself and a friend or two for dinner at the bloody Keg (for the uninitiated: a particularly expensive steakhouse restaurant). If I had a dollar for every time someone freaked out over the Willow/Tara subtext back in the fourth season of Buffy, I could buy myself the entire collection of Aubrey-Maturin books -- again.

There's a reason Queer as Folk and The L Word run on a cable network, people. It's because even while shows like Buffy, Angel, and Xena run on the far fringes of "mainstream" television, they'd still lose a huge chunk of their audience if their central figure(s) were queer. That's just. the. way. it. is. Does it piss me off? Of course! But in a day and age where the only "acceptable" queer show is bloody Will and Grace, I think we do sort of have to count our blessings. Oz and Six Feet Under are still just cable shows.

ExpandShould there be more? Of course. )
ashinae: (Default)
Expand#1-#3, hidden cuz they have the potential to make someone rip me a new one )

(4) How come I am having so much trouble drawing a frelling ball of yarn (for [livejournal.com profile] helens78 *waves*!) in Illustrator?

(5) Why haven't I heard anything about when the Farscape miniseries is being aired in Canada?

(6) How did I not know about Frou Frou's music earlier? ♥

(7) Why don't I ever have anything to talk about anymore?
ashinae: (Default)
Having just read someone over in [livejournal.com profile] fanficrants (where I ventured from a quote on [livejournal.com profile] metaquotes) say "as movies are NOT canon in this fandom" in regards to Harry Potter...

Why is that okay? Really. Why is it that so very many people reject the movies as being any sort of canon in Potterdom, even when, while Rowling says that no, Tom Felton is not Draco and no, Jason Isaacs is not Lucius, she still has a lot more say in what happens there than people seem to acknowledge?

On the flip side -- why in the name of all that is good and fantastical in this world, can a person barely escape from being lynched when wanting to deny the validity of the Lord of the Rings movies as canon? Why is it I still have to look nervously over my shoulder if I want to say in public that I thought Prisoner of Azkaban was a hell of a better adaptation than Return of the King -- saying this in fear of people from both fandoms, for opposite reasons?

Why does it seem far more okay to accept Sean Bean as the ideal Boromir, than Alan Rickman as the ideal Snape? Why are the fans of Tolkien's vision sneered at by fans of Jackson's vision, while fans of Columbus's (*snerk*) Cuaron's vision are sneered at by fans of Rowling's vision?

Why is it more acceptable to do a mish-mash personal canon of both Lord of the Rings movie- and bookverse, while if you take both canons and combine them together in the Potterverse, you're looked upon as a second-class citizen?

After all, I could be snobbish enough to say that yes, The Lord of the Rings is most certainly literature -- true, it's only stood the test of 50 years, but if anything, it is the grandfather of the fantasy genre. Harry Potter? Not so much. What gives the Harry Potter fandom more right to be anal about their books than the Lord of the Rings fandom? Why don't the book fans get looked down upon the way the LotR book fans do?*

Why is it that there is such a polar difference in these fandoms, in regards to the source texts, and the movie adaptations?

*OMG. If it's not been made at all obvious, I love the Potter books. I adore them, though admittedly, I would so not put Rowling on the list of fantasy greats. Possibly not even among the greats of children's literature. Don't flame me over that last paragraph, for the love of God. It's certainly flame-baity in regards to the more militant of the Potterfans, but if you can't figure out that I was saying that to make a point, rather than saying something that might make people think, I can't help you. Don't go looking for stuff to get yer knickers in a twist in this journal. It's curiosity, that's all.
ashinae: (Default)
Wolfsbane potion. Remus takes it. I know that at the time of the full moon, he'll turn into a wolf, then curl up and go to sleep. Now, what I'm pondering is, does he curl up and go to sleep because:

(a) the potion essentially knocks him unconscious (it's like Contac C for werewolves!)
or
(b) when you're a werewolf with no desire to hunt human prey, it's better than spending all night scratching your ears and licking your bum.

I can't remember having the explanation for this in-text, but then, I'm a pretty typical dumb blonde and could have possibly missed it. Hee! Ahem, yes. Or has it been said anywhere, or is there one that makes more sense, or... what?




It's sad when you're reading a genuinely funny essay about the frustrations of fandom and fanfiction and poor characterisation and bad sex scenes when BAM! Everything is destroyed once again by yet another writer saying something about "badfic" writers turning grown men into weepy thirteen-year-old girls. GAH. Dude, do NOT make me write another essay about the inherent sexism in that.

Weepy != girly

Got that?

Weepy = baby. Weepy = immature.

How could saying otherwise, that someone who cannot control their emotional reactions must be a girl -- how can that possibly be anything but a sexist remark? The one person I have known in my life who cried over every little thing that went wrong was a very emotionally fragile teenage boy, whereas my two best girl friends only ever cry when they are under extreme stress because they've always had good, mature, adult coping skills. The people who have absolutely no control over their reaction to cry over every upset, who have such poor emotional coping abilities, are infants. Children. People who are very, very immature.

It is not. a. female. thing. All right? Stop giving in to society's gender expectations by saying it is. Just stop.
ashinae: (Default)
I still love it. The love has not diminished at all with a third viewing. I feel about this movie the way I think I should have felt about Return of the King. Certainly there are issues with the details missing -- I don't see why the production team felt it necessary to make it shorter than the first two, as if any of the three Harry Potter movies were worthy of the 150+ minute running time, it was this one.

But watching it didn't make me feel like I was watching a massively long commercial for a video game or for Weta or MASSIVE. I can't say that any of the story's emotional core was lost amongst hippogriffs and Dementors and ... such (Christ, would I get bitchslapped for spoiling someone who hasn't seen it and hasn't read the book for the dealy with Lupin's Issue after the Big Plot Reveal in The Place With the Reunion? I mean, is there anyone who actually doesn't know what's up with Lupin?) the way that much of the Return of the King story was lost amongst the orcs and trolls and Shelob. I was just about to start going on about that, but I shan't as I think that's a post for another time.

I am not sure that there's anything else I want to actually note that I haven't already, except for two small things:
Expandcut for what other people would consider spoilers )

*

This is a spoiler: Luke loses his dad's lightsaber after Vader cuts off his hand at Bespin.
This is a not: Luke has two lightsabers -- one's blue, the other's green.
This is a spoiler: Darth Vader is Luke's father.
This is a not: Anakin and Padme are going to have kids at some point during or at the very least just after Episode III.

People, get over yourselves about "spoilers". I used to not watch trailers, but you know, I got over that -- particularly when the movies are based on books I have read. The way a movie LOOKS is not a frelling spoiler. The fact that Princess Leia wears cinnamon buns in her hair is not a spoiler. Snape stalking into a classroom and using his wand to close windows -- not a spoiler, sorry. That Big Thing in Harry Potter book 5 that is still, in fact, referred to as "That Thing That Happens In Book Five" is a spoiler (please, read the book -- it's silly that we have to "protect" those of you who won't know until, what, two thousand and bloody seven or so?).

Part of the whole watching/not-watching trailers thing for me was that I was picking and choosing. What were the Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings trailers giving away that I didn't already know, with the exception in LotR of Arwen's storyline? And it's not like they were going to up and have her die or leave at th end. I knew how her story was going to end -- she was going to turn around and come home and marry Aragorn. And with any other movie I have to watch these trailers to get some feel for whether or not I want to see the movie at all. What's the point in watching trailers for Troy and King Arthur and not for HP or LotR?

Spoilers give away plot points. The Big Reveal scene in Prisoner of Azkaban is a big fat spoiler that, you know, reveals the entirety of the plot leading up to that and changes the way you view a movie. It diminishes the shock or surprise of the story.

You've never watched or read Lord of the Rings. Someone mentions that Gandalf fights a balrog. You freak out. You = moron. Come on. You don't know what a balrog is. You don't know what it looks like. You may have some VAGUE idea who Gandalf is. How does this information spoil your movie viewing for you? Now, if someone says Gandalf fights a Balrog and DIES, then you have every right to be upset for having this big plot point ruined for you.

Minute details don't destroy your movie viewing. Would your enjoyment of Fellowship of the Ring really have been destroyed by someone saying "During that heart-to-heart chat that Aragorn and Boromir have -- notice the tear-tracks going down Boromir's face!" That isn't a spoiler, folks. Sorry.

I think it's ridiculous that the two points I put behind a cut, are even behind a cut. They're small details. You don't know what they relate to unless you've SEEN the movie. They aren't spoilers. I can maybe, vaguely, understand not wanting to know about the first one (though, really, if you've seen the first movie...), perhaps while squinting. How can anything actually be a spoiler when there is absolutely no context whatsoever for it? How could knowing such tiny details possibly ruin the enjoyment or plot of a movie? Explain this to me, please. I will never understand the mindset of the Overly "Spoiler"-Allergic out there.

It's silly to walk on eggshells like this. Really, really silly that we have to be careful of everything we say in regards to the current books and movies so as to protect the people who haven't read or watched them. Knowing that Hogwarts is in the Scottish highlands doesn't actually spoil the movie for you, does it? I genuinely do not understand.

Bwah hah.

Apr. 23rd, 2004 12:12 pm
ashinae: (Default)
Something interesting I read --

Kids shouldn't be reading or writing slash. And they are probably only
writing it because they've read it from some adult site or zine. I doubt
that they would have come up with the idea on there [sic] own.


*raises hand* Ooh! Ooh! I was writing Legolas/Gimli when I was twelve. Xena/Gabrielle when I was thirteen or fourteen. Fraser/Vecchio when I was seventeen. Of these -- only the Fraser/Vecchio after my awareness of the existence of slash online. And I would have written it ANYWAY.

So c'mon, people on my flist. Anybody else out there writing slash when they were underage and/or unaware of the existence of it as an actual "thing"? Tell, tell.

Curious...

Feb. 11th, 2004 06:42 pm
ashinae: (Default)
Are there people out there who are simply AGAINST putting pairing information in their posts to mailing lists? I mean, really. I don't care what the rating is, who wrote it, what fandom it's written for -- no pairing? Delete delete delete. If you can't tell me who you're writing about, even if it is Aragorn/Boromir or Sirius/Remus or Lucius/Snape or Arwen/Eowyn or WHOEVER -- you can't tell me this, then I'm not going to waste my time trying to figure it out. Maybe it's a bit of paranoia or something on my part, but I'd rather read Sirius/Remus badfic than the best, say, Harry/Draco on the 'net.
ashinae: (Default)
And, yes, [livejournal.com profile] sara_elf, it was a tad on the painful side. I will have to take it easy for the rest of the night, my brain may not be able to cope with the thinking. Ow.

Anyway, yes, I had a thought. After reading about the wank on the Sirius/Remus ML, about how it's pretentious and immature to end a story with "the end" or any such thing, my brain said something to me.

My brain said: "I hope whoever this person is, has not seen Return of the King."

Because, really. The end. The end says, The End.

If it's pretentious for a writer to say "The End" so as not to make people think there's more to the story, what does that make Peter Jackson?

Something to ponder as I respond to comments to my rantage of the other night.
ashinae: (Default)
I would just like to make a few things plain and clear, in case I suddenly say something later that somebody will find offensive, and will need to unFriend me. This may make it much easier to get it over and done with right now. I am an opinionated bitch, and if that's too much for somebody to handle, then it's probably best that I put this out on the table.

Of course, it goes without saying that these are merely the opinions of a relatively young person who hasn't even finished college yet, and I have always believed in the concept of agreeing to disagree, but from reading some stuff on my friends page, it seems that some people can't cope with that concept. Therefore, here I go:

(1) FotR is still my favourite. I get caught up in RotK when I watch it -- have seen it three times now -- but then several hours later, it just feels very flat. It feels like a good third of the movie is missing so that we can watch special effects. Grr, I say. Where's the real movie? Where's the story? What happened to all the characters besides Frodo and Sam? I always felt that despite the title, Return of the King is about Sam, but really now. The other people in the story did more than kill Orcs. Where's the damned Extended Version, I've been robbed!

Before anybody says that I like FotR best just because of Boromir, let me also say this -- I get thoroughly, horribly bored during action sequences once they've been going on more than five or so minutes. The fighting in Balin's Tomb felt too long for me. Though, yes, I will admit that what kept Amon Hen from feeling too long for me was watching Boromir, Merry and Pippin.

I love FotR for the same reasons I love M&C -- it's a movie about characters, with a few action sequences cutting up all the talking. Master and Commander is and will remain my favourite 2003 movie (likely only to be challenged by Lost in Translation when I get my hands on the DVD for that in February, if I can trust what "everybody" is saying about this movie). I will be rooting all the way for Return of the King for all the awards it is up for, but I will always feel that the awards given to RotK will in fact be for the entire trilogy.

(2) I can't stand movie Legolas. There, I've said it. I really, genuinely dislike him. He's pretty. And... what else? What does he do, besides Stupid Elf Tricks He is given virtually all the worst dialogue in all three movies, and often only states the very, very obvious -- and one line in RotK merely gives the two-word idiot's version of a speech by Aragorn. *headdesk* I mean, honestly. If somebody can't figure out what it is Aragorn is talking about at that point -- well, if they're a kid, it's forgiven. If they're not a kid, there's no way for me to say what I'm thinking about that without being very, very mean.

I will NEVER make a music video about Legolas. Ever. (Or Haldir for that matter) So please stop asking me. Stop hoping for one. It isn't happening. After RotK is released for home viewing, I will make ONE Elf-centric music video, because the song I have in mind is indeed perfect. And that's it. No more.

As far as I'm concerned, Jackson's Gimli and Legolas are jokes. Very much a disservice to the characters that Tolkien wrote.

(3) Yes, there are things in TTT and RotK that I get excited about. There are things about them that I love. There are more things in either of these movies than in FotR that make me want to bang my head against a brick wall. But I like my movies to be about people, first and foremost. Which is why TTT and RotK frustrate me, because the characters seem secondary to the special effects.

And this, I'm sure, is why three hours after each of my three viewings of RotK, I get a desperate desire to go see M&C again. Damn all the theatres I'd be willing to drive to, for having dropped M&C already.

There. Said.

*looks around*

*waits for the unFriendings to begin*
ashinae: (Default)
I'm sorry to anybody who may have already seen it -- I thought there might be some people who would want to read this, despite the fact that I don't think I'm saying anything that hasn't been seen before. But this doesn't appear to have shown up on anybody's friendslist but my own. Wonder if I accidentally set it to private? Hmm. Anyway -- here goes, one more time.

Instead of sleeping like I normally do, I spent my train ride into Toronto composing this. I considered not posting it, but, dammit, the pants don't make me feel any better, so I am typing this up and posting it. And I am not putting this behind an LJ-cut. Cope. There aren't any pictures, no quizzes. Deal with it.

I have noticed that there has been a great deal posted about fan theft in the SV fandom from [livejournal.com profile] elke_tanzer's journal. I've also come across several links to old posts about such things. There is also what I posted about two weekends ago, and the fact that Miss Desiree obviously doesn't get it.

It is entirely unlikely that any potential rat bastards lying little twerps thieves will see this rant. This makes me sad... they obviously spend enough time at our websites.

There's the idea of intellectual property. There's the idea that we, as fan artists, are stealing the original content. There is that entirely lame-assed excuse that "Well, my FRIEND gave it to me!"

Not once have I ever claimed to be Peter Jacson, JRR Tolkien, Chris Columbus, JK Rowling, or Gregory Widen (director of The Prophecy). If I was indeed any of these people, I wouldn't be doing fanvids, nor would I be writing slash (well, perhaps I would be if I was Philippa Boyens... hmm, something to ponder). Also, if I was indeed Tolkien, I'd be a bit on the dead side. Just sayin'.

This, as we all know, is why I disclaim my work -- as will any good fan. Despite the fact that anyone with half a brain knows that I am not Peter Jackson. He's been far too busy these past few years to go about making slashy Boromir vids, and besides -- he's undoubtedly far more enamoured with the character rape that is his vision of Legolas, than I am. I simply can't be Jackson.

Anyone with half a brain who has watched Fellowship, The Two Towers, Philosopher's Stone (or Sorcerer's Stone, for our American friends), Chamber of Secrets or The Prophecy a fair handful of times -- you are the people I share the vids online for -- know which bits are directly from the source material. You know and I know. I am not trying to pass these bits off as my own because that's just downright dumb. Therefore, it's just wrong of you, dear potential or current rat thief, to take someone else's vid -- in whole or in part -- and say that you edited the thing together yourself. Sure, you edited other people's vids together, but you're taking credit for other people's work. Anything that's not directly out of the movies you're working with, people are going to think you slaved over, and it's just not cool to pretend other people's hard work is your own. The same applies to art, the same applies to fic. Allow me to take one moment to discuss the people who steal hand-drawn/painted fan art and manipulate or ass that off as your own: You frelling suck donkey balls. JUst because it's not hanging in the Louvre or have a name like Da Vinci, Monet or Van Gogh on it doesn't mean it's okay to filch it for your own self-gratification, jerk. Thanks, have a good day now.

Oh, and copying and pasting fanfiction? Just so you're aware: this sucks too. I don't make this shit up. You wouldn't actually retype Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, change the names, and try to get it published, would you? Of course not. Please, out of the basic decency that is supposed to be in you because you should know right from wrong -- please don't copy, paste, search and replace names in fanfiction, either. It still takes time and efford and blood and sweat and tears, even if the characters aren't ours.

Similarities in fic? Hmm, that's something else entirely. There are cliche'd situations and phrases that come up a lot. I'm almost waiting for the point where we have fanfiction author A write a story about, say, Remus and Sirius getting stuck together in, say, a broom closet, that involves the phrase "'Oh, well, shite,' said Sirius", and then for author B to use the same situation, write a completely different story, but include the same phrase. Then, author A and all her little friends going to hang author B out to dry. Or, maybe not even author A, because author A is a perfectly sensible woman -- maybe just people who read A's story. Now, I want to make it perfectly clear, that in such situations, I will not bother author B. Don't expect me to. Do expect, however, to find me pointing and laughing at everybody who is spazzing out for being, well, a bunch of silly spazzes. Mmkay?

Moving on to the old excuse "My friend gave it to me!" If your friend gave you an essay, and said, "It's okay to hand this in!" ... would you? Maybe I'm either too much of a goody-two-shoes, or way too paranoid, but I sure as hell wouldn't. Even if this doesn't hold water, why wouldn't your friend want their name attached to a full vid with these clips, or post the story, themselves? Probably because they know it's not cool for them to do so -- but hey, they get off fairly well scott-free if you do it for them like the dumbass you are, dumbass. I think, then, that it follows that your friend is a rat who obviously doesn't care if you end up with your name dragged through the mud.

You do not live under a rock. Nobody vids for a fandom if they have never seen the movie. Therefore, you know that it did not look like this in the movie. You know that somebody made the vids/clips you have. I think this makes it pretty clear that you should know it is in fact NOT OKAY to pass them off as your own work. Because you're not six. (Actually, I think I know six year olds who wouldn't do these things).

Fan artists are not movie studios. Yes, some will tell you that no, you may NOT use their work in any way, shape or form. Writers, with good cause, will ell you that no, you may not change the names of the characters and post the story as your own. Vidders may just send you copies of their source, if you need it. And yes, you'll be told no. Others will say, credit me cearly, and you may alter my art, or use a few of my clips. If they say do say no, they are not a bitch, no matter what you think. "No" is a part of every human language. You will have problems later on in life, my dears, if you don't learn how to cope with this word. It's a lovely, simple word. Embrace the "NO" and move on with your life.

You do not have the right to pass off my work as your own, and I do not have the right to pass off Peter Jackson's or Joanne Rowling's work as my own -- which is why I bloody well don't.

So grow up, okay? The world is your oyster, but there are other people and you have to share the oystery goodness. Writing and drawing are things that sometimes people just can't do. But anybody, with enough practice, can learn how to use Paint Shop Pro, Photoshop, Premiere, or any other video editing program. Teaching myself editing and Paint Shop was a difficult, long process. I am still learning. But it has been deeply satisfying to see myself improve as an artist. Even the writing took practice, I wasn't born with that ability, either. And you know something? You can experience this satisfaction too. Kind of like when your training wheels came off. Would you take away somebody else's post-training wheels euphoria and live that as your own? Of course not; you want to experience that on your own.

So don't steal that feeling from somebody else, okay? Please play nice with the other fans.

And please, from the bottom of your hearts, thank people like [livejournal.com profile] nigellus/Desiree for doing what they do -- because the vids at Drawn To the Rhythm are very likely not going back up, unless I re-edit them, because the old vids with my old source won't take watermarks. They need to be re-edited if I want the watermarks on them, and I do. (Hopefully, these thieves don't have a network, going around sending each other my un-watermarked vids.)
ashinae: (Default)
1) [livejournal.com profile] zasjah: They came! YAY! And they work! Or at least, they play. I will watch them when I can really sit down and enjoy them... unfortunately, this may not be for several weeks. *pout*

2) What is UP with people being involved in fandom, and not being able to spell the characters' names properly? I saw "Aniken" attached to somebody's Star Wars prequel vid.
2b) Had a horrible full-of-myself moment on this site. Had a little description saying that the vidder had seen "so many" LotR vids that SUCK, and I thought, "Well, MINE don't." And then I thought, "And if you think they do, YOU suck." And then I had to punish myself and read some of my old Due South stories to remind myself that, yep, I'm not that great. *G*

3) I'm sure everybody is sick of hearing this by now, and also won't really miss anything since I don't write any fic on my own anymore, I am taking November off with [livejournal.com profile] cruisedirector for NaNoWriMo. There may also be a complete lack of any viddage until November is over as well. But if I have time, and get my Two Towers EE early, I will try my damndest to make extended scene screen captures and have them up for droolage.

4) I have a great Jason Isaacs icon but I can't decide which of my icons to take down. I love them all muchly right now. I may have to sacrifice "Still Sharpe", which I have had up for as long as I've had my journal. Poor Sharpe.
ashinae: (Default)
Ahh, I do love a good cause. And shameless fawning upon others ;)

First -- thanks to Sara, and to Jo, because without my two loveliest of lovelies, I'd never have started sharing in the first place.

Thanks to a lovely lady named Sally, from way back in the day in the Due South fandom -- I used to bounce everything I wrote off of her, after bouncing it off of Sara and/or Jo.

Thanks to Lavonne, and AC Canadensis, wherever they may be right now, for their help with my first Lord of the Rings stories.

And thank you to [livejournal.com profile] cruisedirector, [livejournal.com profile] zasjah, [livejournal.com profile] kirbycrow and to [livejournal.com profile] rushlight75 (I know, I still owe you a story! *sheepish*) for the efforts and patience they have provided at various times.

You all rock so much.
ashinae: (Default)
Warning: strong opinions & bad language.

Bad fic.

In every fandom, for as long as there is fandom, there will be rants written about bad fanfiction. Thank goodness, I have been only remotely involved in one such kerfuffle, and that was enough for me. Something always ends up irking me -- and it's always this one, "little" thing -- whether or not I am involved, and I've suddenly realised that it bothers me more than the bad fic itself. Naturally, I don't enjoy nor do I read what I consider to be really bad fic, full of bad characterisations, and horrendous spelling and grammar and punctuation, but there is one thing, that always comes up, that pisses me off even more than the bad fic.

"Girly men."

God knows I end up laughing my ass off over fics where grown men sob endlessly. It's something that should stop, now. But so should the phrase "girly men" when it's being attached to the idea of grown men sobbing endlessly. It's inherently stereotypical, sexist, and playing into the "gender role" bullshit. No, men don't usually cry over every little fucking thing, but neither do most women. Yes, some do, but guess what? Some guys do, too. Gasp. I've known some in my life, so I know they exist.

The only times I've ever known my two closest friends, Sara and Jo, to cry a lot is when they're under extreme mental, emotional or physical stress, whereas given the right mood, I can cry over a fecking long-distance commercial for Bell Canada. Does that mean Sara and Jo are manlier than I am? Does this mean that I'm more of a girl than Sara and Jo? Well? No, it just means that I'm more emotional. It has nothing to do with my sex. It means that they don't cry as much or as easily as I do.

When we have stories where Blair/Ray/Orli (not that I read RPS, of course)/Clark/Iolaus/whothefuckever is all sobby, it's not because he's girly. If reading a story that had Gabrielle/Frannie/Arwen/Lana/Delenn sobbing over everything, would you honestly think it was simply because she's a woman?

Look -- crying has nothing to do with sex. It's more "socially acceptable" for a woman to cry, but let's be real here -- it's because it's only "socially acceptable" for men not to have emotions. News flash! Men cry sometimes too. It's not because they're weak, or effeminate, it's because they're human.

(Look at Lord of the Rings. These guys cry a lot, particularly in the book. They're not afraid of their emotions. More power to 'em. How many people think these guys are a bunch of pussies, really? Listen to the commentaries included the Extended Version DVD for Fellowship, these actors fought to keep the high emotions and tears!)

I am not trying to say that it is realistic in any way to write a grown man constantly weepy. But, frankly, it's just as unrealistic to have a grown woman constantly weepy. It's not about gender, folks. It's about the difference between children and adults. It's about maturity. I've known several people in my life, of either sex, who cry/cried whenever something goes/went wrong, whenever they get reprimanded at work, and so on, and it comes down to the fact that they are/were emotionally immature people. I used to do it. And then I grew out of it. I don't believe I can think of anybody who does this above the age of twenty. The very few older teenagers I know who behave this way, are the most immature people I've ever met, in virtually all respects.

Children cry about everything. It's childish behaviour, to be this sensitive, not girly behaviour. Please. Get this straight. Because I have stopped crying over everything that goes wrong does not mean that I've suddenly been infused with extra testosterone. It's because I'm more mature than I was when I was twelve!

What this characterisation issue comes down to is not that these guys are acting "girly." It's that they're acting like babies. Emotionally unstable babies. To say that they're behaving like women is inherently chauvinistic -- and I don't care if the people using the term "girly men" are women. Please, for the love of what remains of my sanity, knock it off -- it's "babyish", not "girly." Try moving away from the way we have been socially conditioned, okay? Emotion is human -- it has nothing to do with one's gender. And the inability to control emotion is not about gender, but about maturity, or a lack thereof.

April 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios