*small flail*
May. 11th, 2007 09:15 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
OK, I'm being all wanky, I know, but at least I'm doing it in my own journal.
Hayden Panetierre and Milo Ventimiglia have great chemistry. They, like a handful of their co-stars, are the kind of actors who could very potentially also have great chemistry with, y'know, everybody on the show and most of the props and scenery.
And I am not bothered about the related thing. At all. I mean, dammit, people know how I get over Peter/Nathan.
But am I the only one, seriously, bothered by the age thing? By the fact that canonically, she's fifteen (going-on-sixteen, yes, but I distinctly remember Mr Bennet saying she hadn't yet seen her sixteenth birthday), and Peter is canonically twenty-six?
And, y'know, it's not the eleven year gap that bothers me. If she was twenty-five and he was thirty-six, whatevs.
She's a child. Very mature, sure, but she's a kid. He's a grown-up. Maybe, yes, I have some very personal issues wrapped up in this, but it's ... *flails, not in the good way* Are people just sticking their fingers in their ears and going la-la-la-la?
Hayden Panetierre and Milo Ventimiglia have great chemistry. They, like a handful of their co-stars, are the kind of actors who could very potentially also have great chemistry with, y'know, everybody on the show and most of the props and scenery.
And I am not bothered about the related thing. At all. I mean, dammit, people know how I get over Peter/Nathan.
But am I the only one, seriously, bothered by the age thing? By the fact that canonically, she's fifteen (going-on-sixteen, yes, but I distinctly remember Mr Bennet saying she hadn't yet seen her sixteenth birthday), and Peter is canonically twenty-six?
And, y'know, it's not the eleven year gap that bothers me. If she was twenty-five and he was thirty-six, whatevs.
She's a child. Very mature, sure, but she's a kid. He's a grown-up. Maybe, yes, I have some very personal issues wrapped up in this, but it's ... *flails, not in the good way* Are people just sticking their fingers in their ears and going la-la-la-la?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 08:01 pm (UTC)Yes. Yes, they are. *g* But then again, fandom is known for incredibly powerful denial & ignoring whatever aspects of a show you want to. Not just Heroes, any & all fandoms. Not that that's a bad thing, mind you. As a slasher, I would have no room to throw stones.
The age thing does stop me though. The related thing does as well, but to each their own on that. I completely get why people find Peter/Nathan or Sam/Dean appealing (in a sexual sense), but for me personally, it's not my thing. But I don't judge at all. The age thing...is somehow a little creepier. I don't know why it would bother me when incest doesn't. I guess because she can't really be 100% a consenting adult at 15. That's also why whenever I occasionally wander into HP fiction, I can't read anything that pairs any of the kids with any of the adults. But maybe HP is a whole other subject. *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-11 09:17 pm (UTC)I do understand the disturbing factor of Claire's still being a kid thing (as well as the incest thing that's so dirty wrong hot) and have a certain level of disgust for the people who blatantly ignore that in favour of seeing the pairing they want. In any fandom where they pair a child with an adult, really. It's far more interesting to have the topic discussed and probably angsted over than to just pretend it's not an issue.